Digital Initiatives Home About the Digital Initiatives Services Research and Development Metadata Reports Ask Questions Virgo Catalog
University of Virginia
University of Virginia Library
Digital Initiatives: Reports

Digital Preservation Assumptions

September 20, 2002

1.      We are only preserving the digital object at the most rudimentary level and not the original environment in which the item was delivered.

a.       Everything that will be preserved will be migrated.

b.      We are not committing to preserving the original hardware, software, or operating system involved in creating the digital object

i.      Any desire to preserve the original "look and feel" is out of the scope of digital preservation.

2.      Anything that a selector approves of for the Central Digital Repository should be preserved by a trusted provider or through our own preservation efforts.

a.       The preserved object will be the fullest expression of the content as indicated by the metadata.

b.      This "fullest expression" will then be called the COLLECTION MASTER.

i.      PRESERVATION OF DIGITAL MATERIALS BEGINS WITH THE CREATION OF THE RESOUCE: the onus is on the creator to make sure the proper metadata accompanies the original object.

3.      The preservation strategy of migrating collection masters will be predicated upon the format in which they were originally collected.

a.       Following the LofT Format Committee's decisions, items to be preserved should adhere to a specified list of formats.

b.      If items (even though admitted through selection) do not comply to specified preservation formats, they will be migrated for as long as possible as long they are still "readable" by the current generation of tools.

c.       When objects are no longer "readable" by the current generation of tools, they will no longer be kept in the migration cycle.

d.      NOT ALL MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE PERMANENTLY PRESERVED.

4.      The Library will require a format specific (or media specific) policy.

a.       There may be a variety of formats for collection masters. A specific case for media can be made.

b.      The current recommendation of this Committee will be for all digital material to be transferred to DVD.

i.      For now, one exception is Digital Video, which will be preserved in tape form.

5.      The Collection Masters will need to be placed on a refresh cycle of no more than five years. A period of every four years is recommended following peer practice.

6.      This strategy document will develop from the premise that while UVa Library must address long-term preservation of and access to materials within its collections, this document addresses only the next 3 years. This is meant to be an interim document .

a.       Resources created or under threat within that period should be targeted for preservation immediately.

b.      This policy should be designed to provide adequate guidance for UVa Library material and projects in order to ensure we are not dealing with legacy problems again when it is revised.

Not included:

  • Who manages the preservation process?
  • Who handles the collection masters?
  • Where does preservation fit in the workflow? (Proposed for the beginning -- two copies, collection and delivery master).
  • What costs are expected?
  • Equipment decisions:
    • Media -- DVDs, tapes
    • Burners
    • Jukebox
  • Management technologies

Digital Initiatives
University of Virginia
PO Box 400112
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112

Digital Initiatives Home • UVa Library Home
Search the Library Site • UVa Home
Maintained by: dl@virginia.edu
Last Modified: Monday, June 02, 2008
© The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia