Artistic Expression
Art frequently provokes a passionate response, possibly because
we cannot easily escape the visual. The censoring of art has occurred
for thousands of years worldwide. In fact, a list of artists who
have been censored can double as a veritable "Who's Who" of significant
artists. Like books and music, visual art often advances a political
view or makes pointed social commentary; subsequently, it becomes
fodder for political and social debates. Should artistic expression
ever be censored? If so, who is responsible for setting guidelines:
parents, teachers, government? Should your tax dollars support artwork
that you might find offensive, dangerous, or exploitative?
In the late 1990s, the Brigham Young University Museum of Art exhibited
a show of Auguste Rodin's sculpture; however, the director and other
high-ranking university officials made an eleventh-hour decision
to omit the famous statue "The Kiss" and three other Rodin works.
The museum director feared that the omitted works did not mesh well
with the theme of the exhibition, indicating that "the nature of
those works are such that the viewer will be concentrating on them
in a way that is not good for us." University officials denied that
the decision was based on concern that the nudity and passionate
embrace of "The Kiss" might offend Provo, Utah's conservative and
largely Mormon audience. This was not the first act of censorship
against "The Kiss." In 1913, the sculpture, thought to be "too daring,"
was removed from an exhibition at the Corporation of Lewes in London.
How often is censorship motivated by a fear of offending or alienating
others rather than by any personal objection?

Rodin, Auguste. The Kiss. Bronze. Between 1898 and 1918.
On loan from the Bayly Art Museum. Gift of George Hammond Sullivan
in memory of his parents, Mr. and Mrs. Algernon Sydney Sullivan.
Sally Mann's photography has a beautiful, haunting quality.
She has produced a substantial number of landscapes, portraits, and
other experimental works that Mann says, "tend toward the soft and
evocativeî. They reveal my intense commitment to my home, to the gentle
hills of the Shenandoah Valley where I have lived almost all my life."
However, Mann remains best known for her controversial photographs
of nude children (usually her own), depicting childhood through an
unsentimental, often frightening lens. Mann has argued that all of
her pictures of children are consensual, but her detractors have accused
her art of being exploitative. Can children give consent to be photographed
in the nude? Can their parents?
Mann, Sally. Jessie Bites. Silver gelatin print.
Ca.1985.
On loan from the Bayly Art Museum.
Mann, Sally. Still Time. New York: Aperture, c1994.
Andres Serrano's 1987 photograph, "Piss Christ," showing
a crucifix in urine caused an uproar when it was exhibited. (The work
on display is from that same series). Some viewers wanted to understand
the artist's motivation before judging his works; others simply found
the photograph too objectionable to tolerate. As an added source of
pique, a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts had funded
Serrano's work. Are some symbols too sacred to alter in any way? Serrano
has courted controversy repeatedly, having created a series called
"The History of Sex" and another depicting the Ku Klux Klan. Is Serrano
making a political statement by pushing at the boundaries of what
we consider "acceptable" artwork? Or, is he just trying to shock people?
Is the former motivation more deserving of protection from censorship
than the latter?
Serrano, Andres. Crucifixion, #2/10. Cibachrome print.
1987.
On loan from the Bayly Art Museum.
Robert Mapplethorpe had a long and distinguished career
as a photographer before succumbing to AIDS in March 1989. His traveling
exhibition entitled "Robert Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment" included
beautiful still-life photographs of lilies, poppies, jack-in-the-pulpits,
and other flowers, as well as portraits and figure studies. In the
summer of 1989, this exhibition was cancelled at the Corcoran Museum
in Washington, D.C., several weeks before opening, because of controversy
over some overt homoerotic images included in the exhibit. The museum
director, Christina Orr-Cahal, cited her "concern that the show would
become embroiled in a political battle over federal funding of artistic
work that may offend." However, the exhibition had aroused no particular
controversy when shown previously in Chicago and Philadelphia, and
the cancellation engendered huge protests. On the eve of what was
to have been the opening of the exhibition, over 900 people gathered
at the Corcoran and projected enlargements of Mapplethorpe's photographs
onto the side of the gallery. Orr-Cahal resigned soon after having
made the decision to cancel Mapplethorpe's exhibit. If you were the
director of a privately owned museum, would you have made the same
decisions?
Ellenzweig, Allen. The Homoerotic Photograph: Male
Images from Durieu/Delacroix to Mapplethorpe. New York: Columbia University
Press, 1992.
On display: Dennis Walsh, New York, 1976 and Patrice, New York,
1977.
Kardon, Janet. Robert Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania, Institute of Contemporary Art, 1990, c1988.
On display: Flowers in Vase, 1985 and Irises, 1986.
Exhibit
Home | Comments | Special
Collections Home Page | Library Home Page
|
Copyright © 2000 by the Rector
and Visitors of the University of Virginia.